Liberals and a host of self-described socialists argue that, deficient as his party and his personal record may be, people must vote for Joe Biden in 2020 because Trump and the Republicans are that much more odious. Once again, working people are urged by these pitiable strategists to vote for the least worst corporate candidate. Rather than weighing the full impact of lesser evil voting, its advocates pretend the scheme has only an up and no down side. But as we will see, the costs of lesser evil voting far outweigh any presumed benefits.
1. Substitute "least bad" or "least offensive" or "least offending" for least worst. 2. Einstein's statement is wrong and shows that he did not, in F. Scott Fitzgerald's view, have a first-rate intelligence, because he did not have "the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function .” 3. Pyrrhic is the correct spelling of the fabled victory in which the costs exceeded the spoils ("Another victory like that and we are done for.")
1. Substitute "least bad" or "least offensive" or "least offending" for least worst. 2. Einstein's statement is wrong and shows that he did not, in F. Scott Fitzgerald's view, have a first-rate intelligence, because he did not have "the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function .” 3. Pyrrhic is the correct spelling of the fabled victory in which the costs exceeded the spoils ("Another victory like that and we are done for.")